前段时间在 v2 看到一个关于并发读写变量的问题:go 一个线程写, 另外一个线程读, 为什么不能保证最终一致性。帖子中给出的例子非常简单(稍作修改)main.go
:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"runtime"
"time"
)
var i = 0
func main() {
runtime.GOMAXPROCS(2)
go func() {
for {
fmt.Println("i am here", i)
time.Sleep(time.Second)
}
}()
for {
i += 1
}
}
既然是问题贴,直接运行的结果应该是出乎大多数人预料的:
╰─➤ go run main.go 1 ↵
i am here 0
i am here 0
i am here 0
i am here 0
i am here 0
i am here 0
...
帖子的回复比较多,涉及的信息量相对杂乱,爬完楼反而感觉没有看懂。这里就不卖关子,直接给出脱水后的结论:出现上面结果的原因是 go 的编译器把代码 i 自加 1 的 for 循环优化掉了。要验证这一点也很简单,我们使用 go tool objdump -s 'main\.main' main
查看编译出的二进制可执行文件的汇编代码:
╰─➤ go tool objdump -s 'main\.main' main
TEXT main.main(SB) /Users/liudanking/code/golang/gopath/src/test/main.go
main.go:11 0x108de60 65488b0c25a0080000 MOVQ GS:0x8a0, CX
main.go:11 0x108de69 483b6110 CMPQ 0x10(CX), SP
main.go:11 0x108de6d 7635 JBE 0x108dea4
main.go:11 0x108de6f 4883ec18 SUBQ $0x18, SP
main.go:11 0x108de73 48896c2410 MOVQ BP, 0x10(SP)
main.go:11 0x108de78 488d6c2410 LEAQ 0x10(SP), BP
main.go:12 0x108de7d 48c7042402000000 MOVQ $0x2, 0(SP)
main.go:12 0x108de85 e8366bf7ff CALL runtime.GOMAXPROCS(SB)
main.go:13 0x108de8a c7042400000000 MOVL $0x0, 0(SP)
main.go:13 0x108de91 488d05187f0300 LEAQ go.func.*+115(SB), AX
main.go:13 0x108de98 4889442408 MOVQ AX, 0x8(SP)
main.go:13 0x108de9d e8fe13faff CALL runtime.newproc(SB)
main.go:20 0x108dea2 ebfe JMP 0x108dea2
main.go:11 0x108dea4 e8c7dffbff CALL runtime.morestack_noctxt(SB)
main.go:11 0x108dea9 ebb5 JMP main.main(SB)
:-1 0x108deab cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108deac cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108dead cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108deae cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108deaf cc INT $0x3
TEXT main.main.func1(SB) /Users/liudanking/code/golang/gopath/src/test/main.go
main.go:13 0x108deb0 65488b0c25a0080000 MOVQ GS:0x8a0, CX
main.go:13 0x108deb9 483b6110 CMPQ 0x10(CX), SP
main.go:13 0x108debd 0f8695000000 JBE 0x108df58
main.go:13 0x108dec3 4883ec58 SUBQ $0x58, SP
main.go:13 0x108dec7 48896c2450 MOVQ BP, 0x50(SP)
main.go:13 0x108decc 488d6c2450 LEAQ 0x50(SP), BP
main.go:15 0x108ded1 0f57c0 XORPS X0, X0
main.go:15 0x108ded4 0f11442430 MOVUPS X0, 0x30(SP)
main.go:15 0x108ded9 0f11442440 MOVUPS X0, 0x40(SP)
main.go:15 0x108dede 488d059b020100 LEAQ runtime.types+65664(SB), AX
main.go:15 0x108dee5 4889442430 MOVQ AX, 0x30(SP)
main.go:15 0x108deea 488d0d0f2d0400 LEAQ main.statictmp_0(SB), CX
main.go:15 0x108def1 48894c2438 MOVQ CX, 0x38(SP)
main.go:15 0x108def6 488d1583fb0000 LEAQ runtime.types+63872(SB), DX
main.go:15 0x108defd 48891424 MOVQ DX, 0(SP)
main.go:15 0x108df01 488d1d107c0c00 LEAQ main.i(SB), BX
main.go:15 0x108df08 48895c2408 MOVQ BX, 0x8(SP)
main.go:15 0x108df0d e84eddf7ff CALL runtime.convT2E64(SB)
main.go:15 0x108df12 488b442410 MOVQ 0x10(SP), AX
main.go:15 0x108df17 488b4c2418 MOVQ 0x18(SP), CX
main.go:15 0x108df1c 4889442440 MOVQ AX, 0x40(SP)
main.go:15 0x108df21 48894c2448 MOVQ CX, 0x48(SP)
main.go:15 0x108df26 488d442430 LEAQ 0x30(SP), AX
main.go:15 0x108df2b 48890424 MOVQ AX, 0(SP)
main.go:15 0x108df2f 48c744240802000000 MOVQ $0x2, 0x8(SP)
main.go:15 0x108df38 48c744241002000000 MOVQ $0x2, 0x10(SP)
main.go:15 0x108df41 e85a9dffff CALL fmt.Println(SB)
main.go:16 0x108df46 48c7042400ca9a3b MOVQ $0x3b9aca00, 0(SP)
main.go:16 0x108df4e e87d27fbff CALL time.Sleep(SB)
main.go:15 0x108df53 e979ffffff JMP 0x108ded1
main.go:13 0x108df58 e813dffbff CALL runtime.morestack_noctxt(SB)
main.go:13 0x108df5d e94effffff JMP main.main.func1(SB)
:-1 0x108df62 cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108df63 cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108df64 cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108df65 cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108df66 cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108df67 cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108df68 cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108df69 cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108df6a cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108df6b cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108df6c cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108df6d cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108df6e cc INT $0x3
:-1 0x108df6f cc INT $0x3
显然,
for {
i += 1
}
直接被优化没了。我们可以在语句 i += 1
添加一个其他语句来避免被优化掉:
for {
i += 1
time.Sleep(time.Nanosecond)
}
重新运行程序,运行结果“看似正确”了:
╰─➤ go run main.go 1 ↵
i am here 30
i am here 1806937
i am here 3853635
i am here 5485251
...
显然,如此修改之后,这段代码并非真正正确。因为变量 i
存在并发读写,即 data race
的问题。而 data race
场景下,go 的行为是未知的。程序员最讨厌的几件事中,不确定性必居其一。因此,一步小心写出 data race
的bug,调试起来是不太开心的。这里的例子因为只有几行代码,我们可以目测定位问题。如果代码规模比较大,我们可以借助 golang 工具链中的 -race
参数来排查该类问题:
╰─➤ go run -race main.go 2 ↵
==================
WARNING: DATA RACE
Read at 0x0000011d4318 by goroutine 6:
runtime.convT2E64()
/usr/local/go/src/runtime/iface.go:335 +0x0
main.main.func1()
/Users/liudanking/code/golang/gopath/src/test/main.go:15 +0x7d
Previous write at 0x0000011d4318 by main goroutine:
main.main()
/Users/liudanking/code/golang/gopath/src/test/main.go:20 +0x7f
Goroutine 6 (running) created at:
main.main()
/Users/liudanking/code/golang/gopath/src/test/main.go:13 +0x53
==================
i am here 1
i am here 558324
i am here 1075838
除了在 go run
上可以使用 -trace
, 其他几个常用的golang工具链指令也支持这个参数:
$ go test -race mypkg // to test the package
$ go run -race mysrc.go // to run the source file
$ go build -race mycmd // to build the command
$ go install -race mypkg // to install the package
需要说明的是, -trace
并不保证能够检查出程序中所有的 data race
, 而检查出 data race
则必然存在。说起来比较绕,大家记住它跟布隆过滤器 (Bloom Filter) 的真值表是一样的就对了。
而要把最开始提到的代码改对,方法有很多,我们可以使用 The Go Memory Model 推荐的 sync 包中的读写锁即可:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"runtime"
"sync"
"time"
)
var i = 0
func main() {
runtime.GOMAXPROCS(2)
mtx := sync.RWMutex{}
go func() {
for {
mtx.RLock()
fmt.Println("i am here", i)
mtx.RUnlock()
time.Sleep(time.Second)
}
}()
for {
mtx.Lock()
i += 1
mtx.Unlock()
time.Sleep(time.Nanosecond)
}
扩展阅读
–EOF–
转载请注明出处,本文原始链接